Report a competitor's violation — without putting your own account at risk.
Arbiqor Expose reads a competitor's public listing and flags only the violations it can prove verbatim — the exact offending text plus the exact Amazon policy it breaks. It checks the product's registration independently first, so it won't false-flag a legitimate product. Then it hands you a ready-to-submit report draft. You verify it and send it.
Excellent wound healing support… Recommended by physicians… for wound care.
Won't false-flag legit products → your account stays safe.
It protects you first
A false report gets the reporter penalized, not the target. Expose reports only what's provable verbatim — so the risk lands on the actual violator.
Evidence, not opinions
Every finding is an exact quote from the listing tied to a specific Amazon policy clause. No velocity guesses, no fake-review hunches.
You stay in control
Public listing pages only. Expose drafts the report; you verify the evidence and submit it yourself. Nothing is filed on your behalf.
A bad report punishes you, not them
Reporting a competitor feels like offense. It's actually exposure. Amazon's Seller Code of Conduct says you "may not... attempt to damage or abuse another Seller." Get a report wrong and the penalty lands on your account — and a knowingly false claim is a defamation problem of your own.
The reporter takes the hit
File a report Amazon can't act on — or one that looks abusive — and the warning, strike, or suspension comes to your Account Health, not the competitor's.
Naive tools flag everything
Bulk "report your competitor" tools fire on superlatives and legal label claims they can't prove. Every false flag is a strike against the account that sent it.
Defamation is real exposure
Accusing a seller of a violation you can't substantiate isn't just rejected — it's a legal claim against you. Truth, quoted verbatim, is the only safe basis.
Paste → Verify → Prove → Draft
One conservative flow with a single bias: when a violation isn't provable, it says nothing.
Paste a competitor ASIN
Drop in the ASIN of the listing you think breaks policy. Expose pulls the public listing — title, bullets, description, A+ text, and badges or claims visible in the images.
Verify registration independently
It doesn't trust the listing's own words. It checks the product against official registries — FDA Animal Drugs / DailyMed for drugs, EPA for pesticides — so a legitimately registered product is never treated as a violation.
Find only provable violations
A finding ships only if it has a verbatim quote AND a specific policy clause: prohibited or out-of-label medical claims, misleading or contradictory content, fake "FDA Approved" / "Amazon's Choice" badges. Substantiated superlatives and puffery are cleared, not flagged.
Get a ready-to-submit draft
For each provable violation you get a neutral report draft routed to the right channel — Report Abuse for policy, RaV for IP — with a pre-submit checklist and hard-stops. You verify the evidence still appears live, then submit it yourself.
Built to be the safe way to report
Registration-aware
Checks FDA / DailyMed / EPA before judging a health claim, so it never false-flags a legitimately registered product — and never burns your account on a clean target.
Verbatim evidence only
Every finding is an exact quote from the listing. No statistical guesswork — the velocity and fake-review heuristics that cause false positives are dropped on purpose.
Correct channel routing
Policy violations go to Report Abuse — no Brand Registry needed. IP infringement routes to RaV, which it only suggests when you actually own the right.
Hard-stop safeguards
It won't let you report an ASIN you sell — that's itself a Code-of-Conduct violation. Arguable findings are held back for human review, never auto-shipped.
Ready-to-submit drafts
A neutral, professional report with the verbatim quote, the exact policy, and a pre-submit checklist — written to be actionable, not emotional.
$0 to run — BYO key
The analysis runs on your own Anthropic key — encrypted, billed by Anthropic at cost, no markup. You only pay for the usage you trigger.
A real Expose run — three provable violations, draft ready
An actual run on a live ASIN sold as a dietary supplement. Expose verified the product's registration independently, then pulled three verbatim claims it can cite against a specific Amazon policy — and wrote the report for you to verify and send.
Excellent wound healing support. Helps the body heal fast! Recommended by physicians and natural health professionals for wound care.
one of the most subtle yet effective natural antimicrobials for your body … Use on blisters, bedsores, cuts, and other wounds.
trusted to help the body eliminate acne. It can stimulate and support stem cell production.
To the Amazon Abuse team, I am reporting ASIN B09M79ZQSY (Colloidal Silver Liquid 500 ppm
) for unapproved drug and disease-treatment claims on a product sold as a dietary supplement. The listing states, verbatim: Excellent wound healing support… Recommended by physicians… for wound care,
and describes the product as one of the most subtle yet effective natural antimicrobials for your body… Use on blisters, bedsores, cuts, and other wounds.
Colloidal silver is not an FDA-approved drug for any therapeutic use (21 CFR 310.548); these constitute unapproved drug claims under Amazon's Restricted Products policy. I respectfully request review and removal of the non-compliant claims.
Where to submit: Seller Central → Account Health → Report Abuse. Select the policy-violation category; no Brand Registry required.
- Confirm the quoted text still appears verbatim on the live listing.
- Confirm there is no on-page registration or substantiation you missed.
- Confirm you do not sell this ASIN or a variation of it.
Same engine, on a registered OTC sunscreen (SPF 50 — an FDA monograph drug): its "broad-spectrum SPF 50" claims are legal label claims → independently verified REGISTERED (FDA/DailyMed) → 0 reports generated. A naive tool would have flagged them and risked your account.
You verify and submit — not us
Expose prepares a draft from public listing data. It never files anything on your behalf. Submit only after you've confirmed the evidence on the live page. Do not submit if the quote has changed or been removed, if there is substantiation you overlooked, or if you sell the ASIN. A report you can't stand behind is a risk to your own account.
Expose vs the alternatives
The two ways sellers report competitors today — and why each one leaves you exposed.
| Criterion | Arbiqor Expose | Mass / naive reporting tools | Hiring a lawyer / agency |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it reports | Only provable violations — verbatim quote + exact policy | Flags superlatives & legal claims it can't prove | Whatever you brief them on |
| Registration check | Independent FDA / DailyMed / EPA lookup | None — trusts the listing's own words | Manual, if requested |
| Risk to your account | Protected — false flags suppressed | High — every false flag is a strike on you | Lower, but slow |
| Who submits | You — after verifying the evidence | Often auto-fires for you | The agency |
| Cost model | Part of Arbiqor · BYO key at cost | Monthly subscription | $$$ per case |
Get Expose with the whole Arbiqor suite
The analysis runs on your own Anthropic key — you only pay Anthropic for usage, usually cents per check. The safest way to report is the one watched and supported.
- Arbiqor Expose — evidence-based violation reports
- Arbiqor Review Removal included
- Arbiqor Lens — full competitor gap reports
- Continuous monitoring — alerts when listings change
- Live specialist support
- Registration-aware listing analysis
- Verbatim evidence + exact policy reference
- Ready-to-submit Report Abuse / RaV drafts
- BYO Anthropic key — pay only for usage
Questions sellers ask first
Only violations it can prove from the public listing: prohibited or out-of-label medical/health claims, claims Amazon restricts regardless of registration (e.g. pesticide claims with no EPA number, "FDA-approved" with no basis), content that's verifiably misleading or self-contradictory, and counterfeit badges baked into images ("FDA Approved" seals, fake "Amazon's Choice"). Each finding ships with the exact offending quote and the specific Amazon policy it breaks.
It won't report legal label claims of a registered product, substantiated superlatives (a "#1" with a dated source on the page), marketing puffery, or anything it can't quote verbatim against a specific policy. When registration can't be verified, it stays silent rather than guess. This matters because a false or unprovable report gets the reporter penalized under Amazon's Code of Conduct — staying silent on a weak case is how Expose keeps the risk off your account.
No — not for policy violations. Those are submitted through Seller Central → Account Health → Report Abuse, which needs no Brand Registry. Brand Registry is required only for intellectual-property claims (trademark, copyright, patent), which route through Report a Violation (RaV) — and Expose only suggests that path when you actually own the right.
It's safe when it's evidence-based and you stay in control — which is exactly how Expose is built. It reports only what's provable verbatim, won't let you flag an ASIN you sell, and holds arguable cases back for human review. It drafts the report; you confirm the evidence on the live listing and submit it yourself. Nothing is filed automatically, so a report only ever goes out on a basis you've personally verified.
Yes. The analysis and the draft run on your own Anthropic key — encrypted, billed by Anthropic at cost with no markup, so it's effectively $0 to run beyond the usage you trigger (usually cents per listing). Public listing pages only; Expose never logs into or touches your Seller Central.
Hold competitors to the rules — without risking your own account.
Run a listing through Expose and get a provable, ready-to-submit report — or a clear "nothing to report." Either answer protects you.